<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Asymmetric Design</title>
	<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com</link>
	<description>Design and Governance for Asymmetric Demand</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 07:22:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Designing Collaborative Systems of Systems in support of Multi-Sided Markets</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This paper was presented in collaboration with Dr Nicholas Whittall (formerly Strategy Director, Thales UK Aerospace Division) at the 12th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference in San Diego with the following abstract:
Recent studies into the operational use of a UAV system have shown that the variety of mission ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/115</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Asymmetric Demand for Defence Equipment</title>
		<description>by Richard Veryard

An independent review into the way the MOD buys equipment for Britain's Armed Forces was published yesterday, Thursday 15 October 2009. [Report, MoD News Article, BBC News]. Key finding.
"The Ministry of Defence has a substantially overheated equipment programme, with too many types of equipment being ordered for too ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/114</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Valuing Agility: A Demand-led approach to Capability Management</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This paper and presentation were given at a RUSI Defence Programme Management Conference 29th to 30th September. It concludes as follows:
Approaching Through-Life Capability Management from a demand-side perspective uncovers three tempos that drive enterprise success within dynamic demand environments. These tempos are themselves governed by the enterprise’s ability ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/116</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Limits to the Use of the Zachman Framework in Developing and Evolving Architectures for Complex Systems of Systems</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This presentation was given in collaboration with Suzanne Garcia at the Fifth SEI Architecture Technology User Network Conference on Architecture at all Scales, May 4-7 in Pittsburgh.
Software architects are increasingly being asked to address how their architectural representations relate not only to those of systems (of systems) engineers, ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/112</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Building Organizational Agility into Large-Scale Software-Reliant Environments</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This paper was presented at the 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference in Vancouver March 23-26 with the following abstract:
The tempo at which an enterprise creates new uses for its systems is different from that of its acquisition or systems development processes. The military continues to confront the issue ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/111</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Enterprise Architecture for Complex System-of-Systems Contexts</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This paper was presented in collaboration with Suzanne Garcia at the 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference in Vancouver March 23-26 with the following abstract:
An enterprise architecture is an accepted, widely used means for an organization to capture the relationship of its business operations to the systems and data ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/110</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Agility and Value for Defence</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

In February 2009, a joint article was published with Nicholas Whittall in the RUSI Journal:

	The Meaning of Value-for-Money

The article argues that costing flexibility of design and valuing agility offer the grounds for new commercial transactions and an approach to the elusive notion of Value-for-Defence. </description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/108</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Modeling and Analysis of Interoperabiliity Risk in Systems of Systems Environments</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

CrossTalk, The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, has published an article on the Modeling and Analysis of Interoperability Risk in Systems of Systems Environments in its November 2008 Issue.  The abstract is as follows:
This article describes the use of a set of modeling and analysis techniques in an ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/106</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Changing the value equation in engineering and acquisition to align systems of systems with dynamic mission needs.</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

This paper was presented in conjunction with Suzanne Garcia, Bill Anderson and Pat Kirwan at the 11th NDIA Systems Engineering Conference in San Diego.  The abstract was as follows:
New kinds of threat and much wider varieties of demand on mission capabilities are requiring the military to achieve unprecedented ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/109</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding and factoring in variability in the execution of SoS functionality</title>
		<description>by Philip Boxer

The Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) has released a Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems.  It "addresses SE considerations to meet capability needs through integrating independently useful systems into a larger system that delivers unique capabilities - a system of systems (SoS) - within the ...</description>
		<link>http://www.asymmetricdesign.com/archives/107</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
