Archive for January, 2007

When is a stratification not a universal hierarchy?

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

by Philip Boxer
By including the third asymmetry, stratification can no longer take the form of a universal hierarchy, but instead must be particular to the relationship to demand. It is this which presents the business with its double challenge.

Managing the SoS Value Cycle

Wednesday, January 10th, 2007

by Philip Boxer
The need for Through-Life Capability Management (TLCM) represents a step-change in the relationship between purchaser and provider that involves both parties in the whole value cycle that requires systems to be understood as more than socio-technical, and makes it necessary to model the structure-determining as well as the structure-determined processes.

Strategy-at-the-edge

Wednesday, January 10th, 2007

by Philip Boxer
Strategy-at-the-edge requires that a double challenge be met which balances internal changes with external opportunities. The effects ladder provides a way of agreeing what this means for both customer and supplier where the customer’s demands are necessarily asymmetric.

The hole-in-the-middle

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

by Philip Boxer
The challenge was the hole-in-the-middle. This was too expensive to satisfy on a bespoke basis, and too complex to run on a commoditised basis. The challenge was to find ways of managing the relationship with the customer differently - the enterprise had to develop an approach to managing infrastructure that could be dynamically customised from the edge of the business.

More than socio-technical systems analysis

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

by Philip Boxer
In what ways must our understanding of socio-technical systems be extended to build on their rich legacy?

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2.5 License
.