Archive for January, 2006

DoJ search requests

Friday, January 20th, 2006

by Richard Veryard
There is an huge gap (asymmetry) between the information requirement (as stated by the DoJ) and the data on Google’s database. In a service-oriented grid-enabled world, it would seem to make more sense (and raise fewer privacy concerns as well) for the DoJ to collaborate with Google (and its competitors) - to compose intelligent and relevant analytical enquiries that can be run by Google (as a service, albeit commandeered by the Government) to help solve the DoJ’s problem.

Banking Services and User-Defined Policy 2

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

by Richard Veryard
Who is going to want the kind of user-defined policies I talked about in the podcast (see previous post)? What are the strategic implications for banks and other service providers?

Banking Services and User-Defined Policy

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

by Richard Veryard
Transcript from podcast, in which Richard provides an example of user-defined policy in the context of banking services.

Architecture Podcast

Wednesday, January 11th, 2006

Podcast with Philip Boxer, Richard Veryard and Ron Jacobs released on Microsoft Channel Nine.

Type III Agility in Organisations

Friday, January 6th, 2006

by Philip Boxer
What is at stake is the ability of organisations to organise themselves around the needs of their customers, instead of requiring their customers to organise themselves around what the organisation is able to provide.

The 21st Century Challenge to leadership

Thursday, January 5th, 2006

by Philip Boxer
Asymmetric demands require you to pay attention to what you don’t know…

BlockBusters and SlowBurners

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006

by Richard Veryard
Many industries (including entertainment and pharmaceuticals) have a heavy reliance on blockbuster products. Asymmetric demand represents a serious challenge to this business model.

Type III Agility

Monday, January 2nd, 2006

by Philip Boxer
In the previous blog on the three agilities, a list of benefits identified by a Gartner report on agility (”The Age of Agility”, 2002) was organised into three groups corresponding to three types of agility. Why? And what does this tell us about what is required to deliver type III agility?

The Three Agilities

Sunday, January 1st, 2006

by Philip Boxer
This post introduces three forms of agility. Looked at in terms of competitive advantage, Agility I and II can contribute to greatly improved operational efficiencies and effectiveness in relation to defined forms of demand.
But it is Type III agility that is needed to cope with turbulent or dynamic markets in which the supplier faces significant variety in the forms of demand it is encountering.

3 Asymmetries

Sunday, January 1st, 2006

by Richard Veryard
This post provides a brief explanation of the three asymmetries, extracted from our Microsoft Architecture Journal article.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs
2.5 License
.